Date: Wed, 06 Jul 2011 23:07:24 -0400 From: Steve Wills <swills@FreeBSD.org> To: freebsd-ruby@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Status of migration to ruby 1.9 as default Message-ID: <4E1522EC.20308@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <4E1520A1.7070805@FreeBSD.org> References: <4E1519B0.1050704@FreeBSD.org> <20110706193945.7d70ff73.stas@FreeBSD.org> <4E1520A1.7070805@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 07/06/11 22:57, Steve Wills wrote: > On 07/06/11 22:39, Stanislav Sedov wrote: >> On Wed, 06 Jul 2011 22:28:00 -0400 >> Steve Wills <swills@FreeBSD.org> mentioned: > >>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >>> Hash: SHA1 >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> In case anyone is interested, here's where we are with migrating to Ruby >>> 1.9 as the default version: > >> Thanks for a nice summary. Seems like a lot of work has been done. > >> So when do you want to make the switch? I'm still not sure it's the >> right time to do it as part of 9.0 release cycle, as it seems that some >> of the important ports are broken and people still using 1.8 for production >> (myself included). > > IMHO, the sooner the better. There will be some fallout, but at the > moment, the rdoc port is broken and thus railties and rails as well. > I take it back about rdoc. I missed a commit and it's fixed. But, railties and rails are still not working as far as I know. Steve -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (FreeBSD) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJOFSLsAAoJEPXPYrMgexuh7MsH/1U+4eXES/LwoxPcW60CLaeE HF5lS6uVQ4Y4A7IhkHC5cHwZfoGRxl770muy18fuBUhGOCjsiq2XR1c7wWtnPSw8 f0fNXCNBlxi6OKFDFlCusbG/b36NrgL0SvsEqc9U3ee78T1fAeTs+NDmFe9KwVCC CCkbGOFD3Fl0iqHAgoCdSei+VYMG9gqohYZD/Jkiirm6J0HaezVmPKlA4bYGzPtV c5fXMzRg+ygSWRWhypFMnJe4VXq/7fFnS5yAax8MWyIdxTW9t1wodLRhFaDMXN+A vViloEBs1oaFFoHU+B3jUQ8oAUYFQ9oJRbTxAG4W6aJ7jna410EAcLRCxutk4Tc= =MT1h -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4E1522EC.20308>