Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2013 13:43:31 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Roger_Pau_Monn=E9?= <roger.pau@citrix.com> To: "Justin T. Gibbs" <gibbs@freebsd.org> Cc: "freebsd-xen@freebsd.org" <freebsd-xen@freebsd.org>, "freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org" <freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Difference in event channel implementation for Xen PV vs HVM guests Message-ID: <514B0073.4070406@citrix.com> In-Reply-To: <9AE68E59-739C-499C-9991-0C84D4584981@freebsd.org> References: <51470A2B.5040609@citrix.com> <9AE68E59-739C-499C-9991-0C84D4584981@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 18/03/13 14:08, Justin T. Gibbs wrote: > Hi Roger, > > I know of no reasons why XENHVM cannot use the full event channel > interface. In fact, Spectra Logic implemented PV timers and a > general cleanup of the HVM event channel interface. I haven't merged > it back yet because I know the changes break PV and I haven't found > time to clean up the PV code, merge the HVM and PV event channel > systems, and move IPI/MSI delivery to event channels. > > I've uploaded Spectra's changes here: > > http://people.freebsd.org/~gibbs/xen_ev/ Hi Justin, There's at least one file which seems to be missing: sys/x86/xen/hvm.c Could you check if you have that file around? Thanks, Roger.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?514B0073.4070406>