Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2019 13:27:20 -0600 From: Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> To: Dennis Clarke <dclarke@blastwave.org> Cc: FreeBSD Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: ZFS with 32-bit, non-x86 kernel Message-ID: <CANCZdfqyof2_DmbW3G3S2q2ZsFo8_zr2YUzO0SrFo1eg-HhiJw@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <2264fde0-d386-518f-2bdb-2b86afe1faf3@blastwave.org> References: <bdfecbf4-00c6-e104-4090-c1013bac5a7f@FreeBSD.org> <2264fde0-d386-518f-2bdb-2b86afe1faf3@blastwave.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Oct 4, 2019, 1:07 PM Dennis Clarke <dclarke@blastwave.org> wrote: > On 10/4/19 10:05 AM, Andriy Gapon wrote: > > > > Does anyone use ZFS with a 32-bit kernel, that is also not i386 ? > > If you do, could you please let me know? Along with uname -rmp output. > > Thank you! > > > > I don't know if that has even been attempted by anyone. The ZIL and ZFS > log comonents require substantial amounts of memory and I am not aware > of anyone with arm devices that have 8GB+ of memory. I have had FreeBSD > current on RISC-V running fairly well with ZFS however that was a purely > rv64imafdc architecture. > In the FreeBSD 10 time frame I know people were running ZFS on arm7 boards. Iirc, there was a long list of tweaks needed to size of the ZIL. A quick google didn't find it. Otoh, I looked at ZFS for NanoBSD when it first came out. I gave up because the 256MB boards at the time made any kind of storage traffic ran things out of memory. Warner I will watch this thread with curiosity. > > > -- > Dennis Clarke > RISC-V/SPARC/PPC/ARM/CISC > UNIX and Linux spoken > GreyBeard and suspenders optional > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CANCZdfqyof2_DmbW3G3S2q2ZsFo8_zr2YUzO0SrFo1eg-HhiJw>