Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2014 09:19:46 -0600 From: Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> To: Ralf Wenk <iz-rpi03@hs-karlsruhe.de> Cc: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Subject: Re: screen(1) crashes plus weird output for screen -ls Message-ID: <18ADCE9C-C604-4067-B4D1-32EC07499231@bsdimp.com> In-Reply-To: <E1WYFYa-00CDeU-Gv@smtp.hs-karlsruhe.de> References: <freemail.20140405150804.40570.1@xmldata04> <E1WTAl0-004Ooa-Au@smtp.hs-karlsruhe.de> <E1WYFYa-00CDeU-Gv@smtp.hs-karlsruhe.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Is this with clang or gcc? Does the other compiler give different = results? Warner On Apr 10, 2014, at 8:02 AM, Ralf Wenk <iz-rpi03@hs-karlsruhe.de> wrote: > Hi, >=20 > the optimizations made by the current Clang seems to be the cause. >=20 > Without optimization (-O0) "screen -ls" shows the expected >=20 > There is a screen on: > 43597.pts-0.raspberry-pi (Detached) > 1 Socket in /tmp/screens/S-root. >=20 > With the first optimization level (-O1) I get >=20 > There is a screen on: > 43597.pts-0.raspberry-pi (Detached) > 120984 Socket=F5=FF=BFl=E5 in . >=20 > and with -O2 >=20 > There is a screen on: > 43597.pts-0.raspberry-pi (Detached) > -1073746696 Socket > =D0 =E1 in =F5=FF=BF8=E8. >=20 >=20 > Ralf >=20 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-arm@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arm > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arm-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?18ADCE9C-C604-4067-B4D1-32EC07499231>