Date: Mon, 4 Oct 2010 09:20:06 GMT From: Attila Nagy <bra@fsn.hu> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/150789: New port: mail/dovecot20 Message-ID: <201010040920.o949K65P050352@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The following reply was made to PR ports/150789; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Attila Nagy <bra@fsn.hu> To: Denny Lin <dennylin93@hs.ntnu.edu.tw> Cc: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/150789: New port: mail/dovecot20 Date: Mon, 04 Oct 2010 11:16:01 +0200 Hi, My personal opinion is that versioned ports are the best. Major versions usually differ so much that an automatic upgrade is not desireable. Take for example Berkeley DB and OpenLDAP... On 10/03/2010 12:00 PM, Denny Lin wrote: > Hi, > > I asked this question on freebsd-ports@, but I didn't really get any > replies. Should mail/dovecot be updated to 2.0 or should a new port be > created for 2.0? > > It seems that the port names are a bit inconsistent. E.g., mail/postfix > contains the latest stable version and older versions are named > mail/postfixXX. On the other hand, net/freeradius contains 1.1 while > net/freeradius2 has the latest version. >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201010040920.o949K65P050352>