Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2002 12:57:39 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@freebsd.org> To: Mark Murray <mark@grondar.za> Cc: arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Warning and lint(1) fixes. Review please. Message-ID: <20020228125739.A34165@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <200202282031.g1SKV9g4053062@grimreaper.grondar.org>; from mark@grondar.za on Thu, Feb 28, 2002 at 08:31:09PM %2B0000 References: <20020228121739.A33808@dragon.nuxi.com> <200202282031.g1SKV9g4053062@grimreaper.grondar.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Feb 28, 2002 at 08:31:09PM +0000, Mark Murray wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 28, 2002 at 08:14:01PM +0000, Mark Murray wrote: > > > > Because you are changing obvious syntax errors, if one uses a non-GCC > > > > compiler, into things that will silently fail; I would be more > > > > comfortable with this change if you kept the errors. > > > > > > > > Can you add #error in the #else cases? > > > > > > NP. I'll make that #error happen only #ifndef lint. Cool? > > > > Why can't lint be made to accept #error, but continue processing? > > 'Cos I'm trying to support multiple lints, and fixing them all seems > a bit unreasonable :-) I think dirtying up the code with tons of #ifndef lint is unreasonable. We have a base lint so that we can change things (ie, modify it). What lint's are you trying to support? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020228125739.A34165>