Date: Sun, 28 Jul 2013 16:23:01 -0400 From: Glen Barber <gjb@FreeBSD.org> To: Gabor Kovesdan <gabor@FreeBSD.org> Cc: doc@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Another CSS suggestion: pre-wrap Message-ID: <20130728202301.GN2272@glenbarber.us> In-Reply-To: <51F57C6E.9050608@FreeBSD.org> References: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1307281057160.9642@wonkity.com> <51F558D2.1010808@FreeBSD.org> <51F56688.5040900@FreeBSD.org> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1307281308390.10705@wonkity.com> <51F57011.2000603@FreeBSD.org> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1307281328360.10705@wonkity.com> <51F57C6E.9050608@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--LXESt2jNC8oCvz8w Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Jul 28, 2013 at 10:17:50PM +0200, Gabor Kovesdan wrote: > I believe it is possible to make them work together. But using these > extensions requires using Saxon as the XSLT processor, which is > Java-based and slower than xsltproc. Even if we end up using Java > for PDF rendering, it would be better to keep the XHTML build fast > and Java-free so that committers can easily test their work. >=20 Yes, please, let's keep it Java-free... IMHO, it is bad enough some of use require use of Java for basic web browsing. Adding that to a our doc build is a big red bug. Glen --LXESt2jNC8oCvz8w Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.20 (FreeBSD) iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJR9X2lAAoJEFJPDDeguUajO/0IAIfJhpeuZbQ0Xe+LXMcLhpuq 1KkiabNtHrzM/b4jQPY+typ8DzkOZfejA5/utCNvycporVd9xFlJDb1n16BYBzhf EUAqmRCt4bu3H44WbENaTUcss3Dd7zgDs2ebc8nKRYqTIGvY2VKDJGplXfNJc8La inBiqT6olBckgIJ9oIeHEoqKQQs8ePhoZ5ejJNyq1KWBsrIka8mNctpOvOfLr+r0 mTNBGKGJvcfmkwYAdrIeg4AGkIYMDfcMUVeIx6b25d5YLM++1KTF396z1PsOJuX5 7fIMcvZE06WPCoxx/nyTos+gzBHnqsLmS6YMU6TiaK31uuMQNijKlQIbcEfgJiU= =GCIP -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --LXESt2jNC8oCvz8w--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20130728202301.GN2272>