Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 3 Apr 2009 13:08:23 -0500 (CDT)
From:      "Sean C. Farley" <scf@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Kostik Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com>
Cc:        Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@leidinger.net>, freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: HEADSUP: new linux infrastructure ports are committed
Message-ID:  <alpine.BSF.2.00.0904031304470.25996@thor.farley.org>
In-Reply-To: <20090403095127.GS31897@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua>
References:  <23488525@bb.ipt.ru> <alpine.BSF.2.00.0904021222330.20710@thor.farley.org> <20090403082742.13151vhzr5fcjfdw@webmail.leidinger.net> <20090403095127.GS31897@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 3 Apr 2009, Kostik Belousov wrote:

> On Fri, Apr 03, 2009 at 08:27:42AM +0200, Alexander Leidinger wrote:

*snip*

>> *at() can not be MFCed as it would change the native VFS ABI (Roman 
>> implemented the FreeBSD side of *at() calls to be able to emulate the 
>> linux *at() calls).
>
> It can be MFCed with low-impact KBI breakage, and I have re@ approval 
> for the MFC. What actually stopped the merge is an issue with missed 
> audit bits for dirfd descriptors. They are missed in HEAD too, so 8.0 
> needs some action to finish this.

Sweet!  :)

BTW, is that re@ approval for committing to RELENG_7 before or after 
7.2?

Sean
-- 
scf@FreeBSD.org



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.00.0904031304470.25996>