Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 11 Aug 2004 22:04:43 -0700
From:      "Bruce A. Mah" <bmah@freebsd.org>
To:        Ken Smith <kensmith@cse.Buffalo.EDU>
Cc:        Oliver Eikemeier <eikemeier@fillmore-labs.com>
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: src/usr.sbin/pkg_install/add Makefile add.h extract.c futil.c main.c perform.c pkg_add.1 src/usr.sbin/pkg_install/create Makefile create.h main.c perform.c main.c	perform.c ...
Message-ID:  <1092287083.796.29.camel@tomcat.kitchenlab.org>
In-Reply-To: <20040812030913.GD27338@electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU>
References:  <20040812012909.GA25768@electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU> <2CD52765-EC03-11D8-887A-00039312D914@fillmore-labs.com> <20040812030913.GD27338@electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--=-1eF8rEa6/BAC98Hh2EKs
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, 2004-08-11 at 20:09, Ken Smith wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 12, 2004 at 03:58:58AM +0200, Oliver Eikemeier wrote:
>=20
> > Ok, I'll write a patch then.
>=20
> [ I said some of this to Oliver privately but it's probably worth
> saying louder... ]
>=20
> First thank you, the effort is appreciated.
>=20
> Second some people had asked that this be backed out.  It sounds like
> Oliver is agreeable to adding -c so I'm OK with his previous commit
> remaining in RELENG_4 as long as adding -c doesn't take too long.
> Despite some users who probably shouldn't be tracking RELENG_4, it
> *is* the -stable *development* branch.  Paranoid users should at this
> point be tracking RELENG_4_10 instead.  Having -c disappear from
> RELENG_4 for a brief time is OK as long as it re-appears in a reasonable
> amount of time (and way before we start talking 4.11-RELEASE).

I'm not sure if I want to be replying to this thread, but I might have a
thing or two to say about this subject.

As the original author of pkg_version (the Perl one), I wish I had never
added the -c option.  Of the users I have talked to who used this
option, the majority used it wrongly (as a package updating script).  In
hindsight, this was basically a foot-shooting device.  :-(

If anyone had asked me about this before jumping all over eik@, I would
have recommended that we lose the option as a service to our users.=20
Sorry, but that's the way I feel.

In any case, thanks to eik@ for doing the work, and thanks to everyone
else who believed they were doing The Right Thing (TM).

Peace,

Bruce.


--=-1eF8rEa6/BAC98Hh2EKs
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQBBGvpr2MoxcVugUsMRAl1NAJ9BDvRFyq5Cfqa4lcA9asntkWhN3gCdHc4o
1IG1lixsA4g2IxTarv1zJfU=
=Gtf+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-1eF8rEa6/BAC98Hh2EKs--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1092287083.796.29.camel>