Date: Wed, 04 Sep 1996 20:08:14 +1000 From: Giles Lean <giles@nemeton.com.au> To: "Frank E. Terhaar-Yonkers" <fty@mcnc.org> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: suggestion: Re: Latest Current build failure Message-ID: <199609041008.UAA28175@nemeton.com.au> In-Reply-To: <199609032053.QAA25476@robin.mcnc.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 3 Sep 1996 16:53:06 -0400 "Frank E. Terhaar-Yonkers" wrote: > How about a simple status report? Like simply the CTM # and a one > word status: "ng" (won't build), "builds" and "runs" (reasonably > stable). I'm working on this. I presently think the test for OK should be just that 'make world' ran OK and then a newly built kernel could be booted. This much is easy to automate. Following another posting I guess that if 'make world' fails it should be retried after 'make bootstrap'. Thoughts, anyone? Judging "stable" is rather more difficult for a dumb shell script. :-) Giles
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199609041008.UAA28175>