Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 14 Aug 2012 20:44:41 -0600
From:      Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com>
To:        Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org>
Cc:        freebsd-arm@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Building ARM ports (was Re: Globalscale Dreamplug and 8.3 RELEASE)
Message-ID:  <48664E9B-0BBB-4C78-B720-9920083E661A@bsdimp.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAJ-Vmok-n_focw5x4nM1Go2c0xRoeU=xehDAtTgeM2%2BtZ94GjA@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <5008728C.5040100@jetcafe.org> <1343846511.1128.34.camel@revolution.hippie.lan> <501B0E04.5040901@jetcafe.org> <1343951251.1128.53.camel@revolution.hippie.lan> <502AEC99.70708@jetcafe.org> <CAJ-Vmok-n_focw5x4nM1Go2c0xRoeU=xehDAtTgeM2%2BtZ94GjA@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

On Aug 14, 2012, at 6:35 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote:

> Guys/girls/etc,
>=20
> OpenWRT manages it. They started from the ground up with having to =
cross-build.
>=20
> Just because the problem is hard to tackle doesn't mean we shouldn't =
try.

Agreed.  I worry the qemu solution sounds simple, but really will be =
harder.  Prove me wrong :)

> There's like a dozen half-done attempts at this. I realise you can't
> address _all_ the ports at once, but surely starting with a small
> subset and working outward is doable.
>=20
> I'll put up a bounty for anyone who actually comes up with a basic
> framework for supporting cross-building ports, documents how it
> does/doesn't work (eg if things like build vs run dependencies) and
> has a basic design for how to slowly fix ports to support it.

I have the basics, and have for years.  I've posted them several times.  =
The trouble is that they are very very basic and need more work.  I =
think you'll need to define the problem a little better before progress =
can be made.

Warners




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?48664E9B-0BBB-4C78-B720-9920083E661A>