Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 24 Dec 2005 03:36:45 -0400
From:      kirubiru <>
Subject:   Re: handbook/firewalls-apps.html
Message-ID:  <>
In-Reply-To: <20051223142809.GB56090@flame.pc>
References:  <> <20051223142809.GB56090@flame.pc>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help
> It's all a matter of what features you need and what *you* feel nice
> working with, I guess.

You're right, that's it, features that users need, then a few advices
like "PF has QoS", or "IPF is good  for NATs".

Well, it's an idea, bye.

  Regarding me, ipfw "has rules closer to english" so that'll be. Bye all.

Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <>