Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 22 Feb 1999 18:40:23 -0800 (PST)
From:      Mike Holling <myke@ees.com>
To:        jonathan michaels <jon@caamora.com.au>
Cc:        Derek Jewett <djewett@snowcrest.net>, freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: ethernet segment spliting
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.4.03.9902221839440.310-100000@phluffy.fks.bt>
In-Reply-To: <19990223132752.B6930@caamora.com.au>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> i don;t think so derek, the best way to describe it is that i have one class c 
> addr and i wnat to use this to setup a 'wan' with just this one addr space. 
> problem being that thier are 3 (at teh moment) locations that are 
> gepgraphically disperced and can only be reached by ppp over telephone lines.
> 
> to tie this together i ned to setup several bridges over which teh remote 
> network segments would communicate. at least this is how i see it from what 
> i've managed to understand about the diferences between ethernet 'bridges' and 
> 'routers'. a class c would loose far too much if it were to be subneted.

This sounds more like a VPN setup.  I don't think attempting to "bridge"
ethernet over a WAN link would work very well.

- Mike




To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.03.9902221839440.310-100000>