Date: Fri, 12 Nov 1999 17:33:06 +0000 From: Josef Karthauser <joe@pavilion.net> To: Brett Glass <brett@lariat.org> Cc: Bill Fumerola <billf@chc-chimes.com>, Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group <Cy.Schubert@uumail.gov.bc.ca>, security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Why not sandbox BIND? Message-ID: <19991112173306.D76708@florence.pavilion.net> In-Reply-To: <4.2.0.58.19991112102309.045abf00@localhost> References: <4.2.0.58.19991111220759.044f46d0@localhost> <Pine.BSF.4.10.9911120922190.85007-100000@jade.chc-chimes.c om> <4.2.0.58.19991112102309.045abf00@localhost>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Nov 12, 1999 at 10:24:44AM -0700, Brett Glass wrote: > Our production systems are running an older version of FreeBSD (we > always stay a bit behind the leading edge), so they do not have > that user. > > --Brett You are _quite_ a way behind. I believe that almost all of the 3.X releases have had this ability. (If you're running later mergemaster is your friend ;) Joe -- Josef Karthauser FreeBSD: How many times have you booted today? Technical Manager Viagra for your server (http://www.uk.freebsd.org) Pavilion Internet plc. [joe@pavilion.net, joe@uk.freebsd.org, joe@tao.org.uk] To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19991112173306.D76708>