Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2001 15:56:16 -0800 From: "John Howie" <JHowie@msn.com> To: "Robert Clark" <res03db2@gte.net>, "Artem Koutchine" <matrix@ipform.ru> Cc: <security@FreeBSD.ORG>, <questions@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: Antisniffer measures (digest of posts) Message-ID: <01c501c07773$180d40c0$0101a8c0@development.local> References: <000701c07750$eb585e60$0c00a8c0@ipform.ru> <20010105154601.A17529@darkstar.gte.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
----- Original Message ----- From: "Robert Clark" <res03db2@gte.net> To: "Artem Koutchine" <matrix@ipform.ru> Cc: <security@FreeBSD.ORG>; <questions@FreeBSD.ORG> Sent: Friday, January 05, 2001 3:46 PM Subject: Re: Antisniffer measures (digest of posts) > I wonder if token ring suffers from this problem? 100VG? Token Ring is worst of all - all data must pass through every node on the ring. Token Bus is no more secure. 100VG offers no better protection than most switchable hubs. john... To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?01c501c07773$180d40c0$0101a8c0>