Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2005 14:41:37 -0500 From: Chris <racerx@makeworld.com> To: John Sconiers <jsconiers@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: boot banner project Message-ID: <42728DF1.9040908@makeworld.com> In-Reply-To: <d904a5e705042912342621236b@mail.gmail.com> References: <57436.216.177.243.42.1114582155.localmail@webmail.dnswatch.com> <6.1.0.6.2.20050426233321.084e9210@cobalt.antimatter.net> <51899.216.177.243.42.1114584317.localmail@webmail.dnswatch.com> <6.1.0.6.2.20050427001118.0327cd50@cobalt.antimatter.net> <52515.216.177.243.42.1114586501.localmail@webmail.dnswatch.com> <d904a5e7050428062443496e3@mail.gmail.com> <61359.216.177.243.35.1114722481.localmail@webmail.dnswatch.com> <20050429105416.GA94049@wedge.madpilot.net> <d904a5e705042912342621236b@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
John Sconiers wrote: ... > Adding less then a meg here or there is not bloat. Unless of course the goal is to > create an advanced operating system unable to get / keep users. > > My $.02 The problem is this; if everyone keeps adding "less then a meg here or there" then you DO end up with bloat. Where to you draw the line? How much is too much? To me, I would rather add that less then a meg here and there to the core OS ... Not to something that (to me) does not need to look perdy. ... and my .02 -- Best regards, Chris If reproducibility may be a problem conduct the test only once.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?42728DF1.9040908>