Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2000 21:28:54 +1000 (EST) From: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> To: Nick Hibma <n_hibma@calcaphon.com> Cc: Matthew Jacob <mjacob@feral.com>, Mark Murray <mark@grondar.za>, FreeBSD CURRENT Mailing List <current@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: if_de as a module... Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0007112126030.24894-100000@besplex.bde.org> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.20.0007102130460.6613-100000@localhost>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 10 Jul 2000, Nick Hibma wrote: > The opt_ files can be generated by the makefiles, so there is no reason > to remove those, see sys/modules/usb/Makefile > > SRCS = bus_if.h device_if.h usb_if.h usb_if.c \ > vnode_if.h \ > opt_usb.h \ > ... > > Any file called opt_*.h that is not present is created (empty). The opt_ files are used includes, so removing them breaks certain functionality in both the statically compiled version and the module. Empty ones for the module only break this functionality for the module. Modules shouldn't depend on options. Bruce To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0007112126030.24894-100000>