Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 15 Nov 2001 21:08:50 +0100
From:      "Anthony Atkielski" <anthony@atkielski.com>
To:        "Andrew C. Hornback" <achornback@worldnet.att.net>, "FreeBSD Questions" <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: DSL PPPoE with 2 NICs
Message-ID:  <006d01c16e11$5b7a5dd0$0a00000a@atkielski.com>
References:  <006301c16e0a$fca53ba0$6600000a@ach.domain>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Andrew writes:

> If $100/hr is a realistic figure, where do
> I sign up?  I'd like to get onto that gravy train...

I've been on that train, but there isn't much gravy to it, after you deduct
expenses.  In fact, $200 an hour isn't out of line in quite a few cases.

> Security happens to matter to some of us, and
> I get the feeling that it would be easier to report
> and fix a problem in FreeBSD than it would be to
> get a fix produced for a router-toaster.

If security mattered that much, you probably wouldn't be running any flavor of
UNIX at all (except perhaps a proprietary, hardened version with a lot of
modifications--and even that is iffy).

> Simply because you could not configure a FreeBSD
> machine "rapidly and securely" does not mean that
> someone else could.

He doesn't sound any better at it than I am.

> I see... so that's why so many people out there
> are rushing to toss out their FreeBSD-powered
> routers for pieces from our friends at Cisco, etc. ?

People with limited budgets may not be able to afford Cisco routers.  I probably
would have bought Cisco myself, if I had had the budget.

> It may not be easy for someone who is new to
> FreeBSD, but you are basing your assertion on
> the idea that everyone that uses FreeBSD has
> the same skill level with it that you
> do.  That, I can assure you, is NOT the case.

It appeared to be the case for the original poster, or nearly so.  Otherwise he
wouldn't have to ask questions, would he?

> Makes one wonder what you've been reading...

Lots of books on IT.  They correlate well with my own experience, too.

> Again, your lack of experience with FreeBSD
> is showing.

Your posts would be more useful if you spent less time telling me that I lack
knowledge or experience, and more time demonstrating it yourself for the benefit
of others.

> Most people realize that a FreeBSD machine as a
> router for a small LAN makes good sense as it is
> easier to maintain, easier to upgrade and easier
> to keep secure.

Then why are hardware routers so popular?

> And once again, you're interjecting your personal
> attack that I am attached personally to FreeBSD.

I didn't mention you at all.  It was a general observation.  Whenever I find
anyone going to a lot of extra time and effort just to get a specific solution
to work, as opposed to just finding the most cost-effective solution for the
job, I infer an emotional attachment to the chosen solution.  There isn't any
other way to explain that sort of behavior, and it is very widespread.

For example, after fooling around a bit with X and KDE, I really wonder why
anyone would choose to use these environments under UNIX instead of just running
a Windows desktop.  KDE froze three or four times in as many hours, and crashed
the system once.  If I wanted an enviroment like that, with ragged edges,
partially painted windows, missing components, unstable applications, and a
general dearth of useful applications to begin with, I'd go back to Windows 2.0
(and in fact the default twm looked a lot like Windows 2.0 to me).  Only someone
with an out-of-band reason for forcing the UNIX environment to work for that
purpose--such as an emotional attachment--would work through all that, and
continue to insist that he had chosen a "better" solution, as he reboots and
tweaks and restarts ad infinitum.

> I simply care to use the best tool for the job, and
> a $100 router which can be replaced by a $20 NIC and a
> $20 PC... well, you do the math.

Let's see: $20 for the NIC, $100 for the PC (sorry, but $20 is not realistic),
and three hours of work at, say, $30 an hour equal ... $210, or more than twice
the cost of the router.  Yes, I did the math, and FreeBSD loses.  In fact, it
loses just on hardware costs alone.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?006d01c16e11$5b7a5dd0$0a00000a>