Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 8 Jun 2018 19:41:53 +0200
From:      Hans Petter Selasky <hps@selasky.org>
To:        Ian Lepore <ian@freebsd.org>, src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, svn-src-head@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r334777 - head/sys/compat/linuxkpi/common/include/linux
Message-ID:  <d6d41f11-5c1b-21cf-a140-7f5b9bb8f0d5@selasky.org>
In-Reply-To: <1528476680.53315.3.camel@freebsd.org>
References:  <201806071141.w57BfhEe076323@repo.freebsd.org> <1528476680.53315.3.camel@freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 06/08/18 18:51, Ian Lepore wrote:
> Will this be a problem on i386, where timespec contains a 32-bit
> time_t?  I think it's the only remaining arch with 32-bit time_t.

The LinuxKPI has no need for 64-bit time. These defines are currently 
only used for debug printouts in drm-next-kmod.

--HPS



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?d6d41f11-5c1b-21cf-a140-7f5b9bb8f0d5>