Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2003 15:16:03 -0800 From: Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@xcllnt.net> To: Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com> Cc: Kirk McKusick <mckusick@beastie.mckusick.com> Subject: Re: HEADS-UP new statfs structure Message-ID: <20031115231603.GA5139@athlon.pn.xcllnt.net> In-Reply-To: <3FB6ACA5.B4192F55@mindspring.com> References: <Pine.GSO.4.10.10311141645540.7284-100000@pcnet5.pcnet.com> <3FB6ACA5.B4192F55@mindspring.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Nov 15, 2003 at 02:45:57PM -0800, Terry Lambert wrote: > > > For 6.0, can we start off libc at libc.so.YYYYMMDD and move it > > back to libc.so.6 for the first release? That way we can bump > > it whenever we want to avoid the "bumpy" rides for -current > > folk. > > This is a great idea! Provided that we 1. keep the major number to allow concurrent development of different (major) library versions, and 2. replace the date with a convenient sequence number, which we can call the minor version number, and 3. Do not reset the version number when we release. E.g.: libc.so.6.0, libc.so.6.1, and (first release) libc.so.6.2... -- Marcel Moolenaar USPA: A-39004 marcel@xcllnt.net
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20031115231603.GA5139>