Date: Sun, 3 Oct 1999 09:17:55 -0400 (EDT) From: "Chris D. Faulhaber" <jedgar@fxp.org> To: David O'Brien <obrien@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Dan Moschuk <dan@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/www/code2html - Imported sources Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.10.9910030912260.68410-100000@earth.fxp> In-Reply-To: <19991003014755.C16573@dragon.nuxi.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 3 Oct 1999, David O'Brien wrote: > > ports/www/code2html - Imported sources > > Update of /home/ncvs/ports/www/code2html > > In directory freefall.freebsd.org:/d/users/dan/code2html > > Should this be moved to textproc to live with `c2html' and friends? > This port really isn't about web servers and clients. > As the originator of the port...I was simply going by http://www.freebsd.org/handbook/porting.html : www Software related to the World Wide Web. HTML language support belong here too. whereas: textproc Text processing utilities.... I associate converting code to html more of a www exercise than text processing. But, I can understand the textproc angle and wouldn't argue about moving it, especially for the sake of being consistent. ----- Chris D. Faulhaber <jedgar@fxp.org> | All the true gurus I've met never System/Network Administrator, | claimed they were one and always Reality Check Information, Inc. | pointed to someone better. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.10.9910030912260.68410-100000>