Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2000 02:38:41 -0700 From: Warner Losh <imp@village.org> To: "Daniel C. Sobral" <dcs@newsguy.com> Cc: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.ORG>, Mike Smith <msmith@FreeBSD.ORG>, arch@FreeBSD.ORG, Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net> Subject: Re: The shared /bin and /sbin bikeshed Message-ID: <200011100938.CAA48105@harmony.village.org> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 10 Nov 2000 18:16:49 %2B0900." <3A0BBD01.ED1EF33E@newsguy.com> References: <3A0BBD01.ED1EF33E@newsguy.com> <XFMail.001109141254.jhb@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <3A0BBD01.ED1EF33E@newsguy.com> "Daniel C. Sobral" writes: : John Baldwin wrote: : > : > > NO_STATIC_BINARIES : > > NO_STATIC_LIBRARIES : > > : > > (and obviously NOPROFILE -> NO_PROFILED_LIBRARIES with a hook to force : > > people to change) : > : > I second these names. : : Actually, the _p libraries haven't been "profiled". They are "profile" : libraries, in that they are used for "profiling". So, : NO_PROFILE_LIBRARIES, please. BTW, I don't like NO_STATIC_BINARIES because that implies no static binaries anywhere, while my patch specifically just does /bin and /sbin. I didn't want to do that globally because I didn't want jdp to yell at me for making ld.so dynamic :-) Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200011100938.CAA48105>