Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2002 22:25:38 -0400 From: Garrett Rooney <rooneg@electricjellyfish.net> To: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> Cc: adam@vectors.cx, ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Oh No! __sF undefined -> bump all major number of all libraries Message-ID: <0FD36663-DE53-11D6-B507-00039364885A@electricjellyfish.net> In-Reply-To: <20021012.201917.43022148.imp@bsdimp.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Saturday, October 12, 2002, at 10:19 PM, M. Warner Losh wrote: > In message: <20021013021627.GA76789@vectors.cx> > Adam Weinberger <adam@vectors.cx> writes: > : -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > : Hash: SHA1 > : > : >> (10.12.2002 @ 1843 PST): M. Warner Losh said, in 0.5K: << > : > We need to bump every major number of every library in the ports > system. > : > Otherwise, when people upgrade, > : > : when people upgrade what? a port? their base? > > We should have bumped the major numbers on all the ports on -current > because of a binary incompatibility in -current's libc. __sF was > depricated in 4.0 and has been removed in 5.0. If you have a library > that was build sufficiently long how can we bump the major number for ports on -current only? the ports tree isn't branched, and we still have to support the 4.X series... -garrett -- garrett rooney Remember, any design flaw you're rooneg@electricjellyfish.net sufficiently snide about becomes http://electricjellyfish.net/ a feature. -- Dan Sugalski To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?0FD36663-DE53-11D6-B507-00039364885A>