Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 07:26:28 -0700 From: Tobias <tobiash@gmail.com> To: FreeBSD <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: 32 or 64 bit as server ? Message-ID: <AANLkTi=PHON6dssHpGEFYHLgDMNhYtS8nUL5HLtax60s@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20101123090036.6caf33b9.wmoran@potentialtech.com> References: <4CEB8EE1.1080702@kukulies.org> <20101123084342.4ab645d9@scorpio> <20101123090036.6caf33b9.wmoran@potentialtech.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 7:00 AM, Bill Moran <wmoran@potentialtech.com>wrote: > > It was only a few years ago that my advice was "Don't got 64 bit unless > you know you need it." > > Of course, things are always changing, and at this point in time, my > advice would be "only go 32 bit if you _know_ there's something that > won't work in 64 bit." > Could not agree more with your statements above. > I can speak personally that we have a multitude of servers running > PHP and Apache 2.2 on 64 bit FreeBSD with no trouble. I don't use > MySQL, but I have a hard time believing that it's not 64 bit clean. Right behind me is my 64-bit FreeBSD 8.1 server that hosts a number of websites. Apache2, php, perl, mysql, memcache, etc. all run just fine without any obvious issues. --Tobias
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?AANLkTi=PHON6dssHpGEFYHLgDMNhYtS8nUL5HLtax60s>