Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2004 08:09:22 +0100 From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jean-S=E9bastien_P=E9dron?= <jspedron@club-internet.fr> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: panic: Inconsistent vnode bufstrategy Message-ID: <99248.1102403362@critter.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 06 Dec 2004 17:04:38 %2B0100." <41B48316.90004@club-internet.fr>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <41B48316.90004@club-internet.fr>, =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jean-S=E9bastien_P =E9dron?= writes: >In file systems like ufs, msdosfs or ext2fs, VOP_BMAP will do: > *ap->a_bop = &VTOI(ap->a_vp)->i_devvp->v_bufobj; >So the vm will call the device bo_strategy callback, and everything works. > >In NTFS, VOP_BMAP is different: > *ap->a_bop = &ap->a_vp->v_bufobj; >The goal is that the vm should call the file system's VOP_STRATEGY, not >the device directly (that's what I guess, I'm not familiar with this fs :-). Spot on, now for an encore, can you also create a patch to fix this ? -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?99248.1102403362>