Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 29 Aug 2004 10:44:56 -0700
From:      Christopher McCrory <chrismcc@pricegrabber.com>
To:        James <haesu@towardex.com>
Cc:        tackerman@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: em driver problem with intel pro 1000xf - force 100/full
Message-ID:  <1093801495.14384.1.camel@wednesday.pricegrabber.com>
In-Reply-To: <20040829074656.GA93946@scylla.towardex.com>
References:  <1093753691.8153.24.camel@wednesday.pricegrabber.com> <20040829074656.GA93946@scylla.towardex.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 2004-08-29 at 00:46, James wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 28, 2004 at 09:28:11PM -0700, Christopher McCrory wrote:
> > Hello...
> > 
> > 	I am trying to use an Intel Pro 1000xf (Multimode fiber/SC connector)
> > card on a FreeBSD 4.10 system.  The switch (not mine) I need to talk to
> > is not configured for auto-negotiation, but forced to 100/full.  It is a
> > requirement on my side to be able to do this also.  My (copper) Intel and broadcom
> > NICs do this fine, but the 1000xf errors out.
> > 
> > ix# ifconfig em0 media 100BaseTX mediaopt full-duplex
> > ifconfig: SIOCSIFMEDIA: Device not configured
> > ix# ifconfig em0 media 100BaseSX mediaopt full-duplex
> 
> There is no such standard that calls for 100BaseSX.
> 
> Try 100BaseFX and see if it works for ya...

Thanks for replying.

ix# ifconfig em0 media 100BaseFX mediaopt full-duplex
ifconfig: SIOCSIFMEDIA: Device not configured

:(



> HTH,
> -J
-- 
Christopher McCrory
 "The guy that keeps the servers running"
 
chrismcc@pricegrabber.com
 http://www.pricegrabber.com
 
Let's face it, there's no Hollow Earth, no robots, and
no 'mute rays.' And even if there were, waxed paper is
no defense.  I tried it.  Only tinfoil works.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1093801495.14384.1.camel>