Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2017 15:23:09 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: x11@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 217886] xorg fails to init GL on stable/11 because of a devel/libdevq bug(?) Message-ID: <bug-217886-7141-oU4mfi1Smr@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-217886-7141@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-217886-7141@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D217886 --- Comment #11 from Jan Beich (mail not working) <jbeich@FreeBSD.org> --- (In reply to Matthew Rezny from comment #8) > What kernel are you running? drm-next (c2af518bfd1) merged with /head@r316260 with some minor hacks like= bug 206711 on amd64. GPU is Skylake GT2 which is supported by i965. > DRM_MAJOR has been defined as 0 the entire time libdevq was used. drm-next probably changed how drm is initialized which affects dev_t value. According to major(3) manpage it no longer can be used to identify devices classes. I don't remember when exactly major/minor was dropped but probably around the same time devfs was introduced. > How do you have 3? I don't know, probably specific to my hardware, kernel configuration, etc. DRM_MAJOR rarely dropped to 1, it was mostly 2 or 3. I didn't care until po= rts r433862 moved libdevq logic to libdrm and broke my setup. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-217886-7141-oU4mfi1Smr>