Date: Mon, 28 Dec 1998 03:00:11 -0800 (PST) From: asami@FreeBSD.ORG (Satoshi Asami) To: jb@cimlogic.com.au Cc: simokawa@sat.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp, sprice@hiwaay.net, alpha@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Alpha ports collection? Message-ID: <199812281100.DAA19630@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu> In-Reply-To: <199812281055.VAA14726@cimlogic.com.au> (message from John Birrell on Mon, 28 Dec 1998 21:55:44 %2B1100 (EST))
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* MACHINE_ARCH=i386 MACHINE=pc98 * MACHINE_ARCH=i386 MACHINE=i386 This is what I wanted to know. Thanks. By the way, what does "uname -m" return in the pc98 case? * Note that non-i386 versions of `make' have MACHINE_ARCH in-built. For * i386, MACHINE_ARCH isn't actually defined in `make'. They get it from the kernel? (Gawd, I hate that.) We need to do something about it for 2.2 machines. Well, alpha is for 3.0 onwards only so maybe something like MACHINE_ARCH?=i386 in bsd.port.mk would do. Satoshi To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-alpha" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199812281100.DAA19630>