Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2004 09:42:12 -0700 From: Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> To: Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@portaone.com> Cc: Jun Su <junsu@delphij.net> Subject: Re: [patch] bug in cpp's #ident handling in gcc 3.4 [Was: ccache with buildworld] Message-ID: <20040826164212.GA62037@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> In-Reply-To: <412E0B6C.8030001@portaone.com> References: <412DF886.4030107@portaone.com> <412E0243.1050808@delphij.net> <412E0B6C.8030001@portaone.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Aug 26, 2004 at 07:10:20PM +0300, Maxim Sobolev wrote: > Pointless. Instead of fixing the problem we will remove condition when > this problem evidences itself. I am not advocating about keeping #ident, > since it is completely orthogonal question. gcc claims that it supports > #ident, there are problems in this support - they have to be fixed. > > Remember, there are lot of software out of /usr/src over which we have > no control (e.g. /usr/ports), so that removing #ident will really be > only half-measure, especially considering that the patch is readily > available. > > -Maxim > Isn't src/contrib/gcc/c-ppoutput.c on the vendor branch? Have you sent your patch to GCC? -- Steve
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040826164212.GA62037>