Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 4 Jun 1999 10:03:55 -0700 (PDT)
From:      Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com>
To:        David Malone <dwmalone@maths.tcd.ie>
Cc:        Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk>, current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: net.inet.tcp.always_keepalive on as default ? 
Message-ID:  <199906041703.KAA08090@apollo.backplane.com>
References:   <9906041725.aa11603@salmon.maths.tcd.ie>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
    I think people just like to argue sometimes.  The reality is different.

    For all you people complaining:  Just turn them on and I guarentee
    you will not even notice the difference, except you will stop getting
    ( even the occassional ) stale internet server process.  That is what
    keepalives were designed to deal with.  Keepalives are not supposed to
    be a network watchdog, they are simply supposed to be a catch-all. 
    So having per-socket adjustment is kind of silly.

					    -Matt



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199906041703.KAA08090>