Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 22 Nov 2003 14:47:22 +0100
From:      Ilya Varlashkin <ilya@samara.net>
To:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Samba question
Message-ID:  <20031122134722.GA97109@CITADEL.NOBULUS.COM>
In-Reply-To: <6.0.0.22.0.20031116200600.034ace70@pop.face2interface.com>
References:  <6.0.0.22.0.20031115211837.0601e780@pop.face2interface.com> <A99A5AC30F74624388EE5F757BA58A20D7A02B@RED-MSG-50.redmond.corp.microsoft.com> <6.0.0.22.0.20031116200600.034ace70@pop.face2interface.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Nov 16, 2003 at 09:08:12PM -0500, Marty Landman wrote:
> 
> No. Now I did & rebooted. Same symptom, i.e. windoz explorer tells me
> 
> \\Swamisalami is not accessible. ... The account is not authorized to log 
> in from this station.
> 

Martin, following line in your smb.conf should solve this problem:

encrypt passwords = yes

This is because newer Windows releases refuse to send unencrypted passwords
by default. You could tweak Windows to enable unencrypted passwords, but I
prefer enabling encrypted passwords in samba instead.

Have a look at /usr/local/share/doc/samba/htmldocs/ENCRYPTION.html for
more details.

Hope this helps.

Kind regards,
Ilya Varlashkin




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20031122134722.GA97109>