Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2010 08:25:27 -0800 From: Marcel Moolenaar <xcllnt@mac.com> To: Ed Schouten <ed@80386.nl> Cc: toolchain@FreeBSD.org, current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: libcompiler_rt now part of FreeBSD's base system Message-ID: <4183CFBE-8C83-4BF1-A7AE-31D701A2DA44@mac.com> In-Reply-To: <20101111155243.GL2054@hoeg.nl> References: <20101111155243.GL2054@hoeg.nl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Nov 11, 2010, at 7:52 AM, Ed Schouten wrote: > Hello all, > > I just committed libcompiler_rt.a to HEAD. Even though I don't expect > serious issues -- especially not on the tier 1 architectures -- be sure > to contact me in case something goes wrong. I hooked it up to the build > in a separate commit, so if your system starts to act weird, just revert > r215127. I'm testing ia64, right now. I see the following: pluto2# chroot /tank/release/current /bin/tcsh # cd /lib # ls -al *gcc* *compiler* -r--r--r-- 1 0 0 104952 Nov 12 15:55 libgcc_s.so.1 # cd /usr/lib # ls -al *gcc* *compiler* -r--r--r-- 1 0 0 172434 Nov 12 15:53 libcompiler_rt.a -r--r--r-- 1 0 0 209196 Nov 12 15:53 libcompiler_rt_p.a lrwxr-xr-x 1 0 0 16 Nov 12 15:53 libgcc.a -> libcompiler_rt.a -r--r--r-- 1 0 0 60754 Nov 12 15:55 libgcc_eh.a -r--r--r-- 1 0 0 65706 Nov 12 15:55 libgcc_eh_p.a lrwxr-xr-x 1 0 0 18 Nov 12 15:53 libgcc_p.a -> libcompiler_rt_p.a lrwxr-xr-x 1 0 0 18 Nov 12 15:55 libgcc_s.so -> /lib/libgcc_s.so.1 This looks like an inconsistency to me. Aren't we building a shared libcompiler_rt to replace the shared libgcc? Should I worry about the EH support? BTW: The chroot seems functional from the minimal testing I've done so far. We're not DOA! :-) -- Marcel Moolenaar xcllnt@mac.com
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4183CFBE-8C83-4BF1-A7AE-31D701A2DA44>