Date: Sat, 26 May 2001 14:55:21 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@freebsd.org> To: Mark Murray <mark@grondar.za> Cc: arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: PAM, S/Key and authentication schemes. Message-ID: <20010526145521.D11876@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <200105251240.f4PCeO612402@gratis.grondar.za>; from mark@grondar.za on Fri, May 25, 2001 at 02:42:40PM %2B0200 References: <200105251240.f4PCeO612402@gratis.grondar.za>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, May 25, 2001 at 02:42:40PM +0200, Mark Murray wrote: > We currently have a slew of authentication schemes in FreeBSD. There > is the usual lot in getpwent(3) and friends, OPIE, S/Key and PAM, and Is there some reason we cannot `cvs rm' S/Key and only use OPIE? OPIE was intended as a replacement for S/Key. > S/Key is OBE in my opinion and needs to be entirely replaced by OPIE. > (And in the majority of cases pam_opie will do the job). Do you know why ?ache? did not totally replace S/Key when he imported OPIE? -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010526145521.D11876>