Date: Thu, 16 May 1996 11:31:50 +0200 (MET DST) From: J Wunsch <j@uriah.heep.sax.de> To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org (FreeBSD-current users) Subject: Re: /stand/ee Message-ID: <199605160931.LAA00861@uriah.heep.sax.de> In-Reply-To: <6878.832214305@time.cdrom.com> from "Jordan K. Hubbard" at "May 15, 96 07:38:25 pm"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
As Jordan K. Hubbard wrote:
> > Oh yawn. If you know how to use vi you know how to set EDITOR in
> > your .cshrc. If you don't, then you want something a little more
> > intuitive.
>
> And, FWIW, I don't even like `ee' all that much - it's NOT the most
> intuitive of editors, it was simply both small and available. People
I don't think "ee" is a bad choice, but "/stand/ee" definately is.
Let the ${PATH} pick the right one instead of hard-coding the /stand
binary, thus wasting Real Memory later.
--
cheers, J"org
joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de -- http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ -- NIC: JW11-RIPE
Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199605160931.LAA00861>