Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2003 01:16:11 -0400 (EDT) From: Trevor Johnson <trevor@jpj.net> To: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Cc: ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Absentee maintainership (Re: cvs commit: ports/security/mcrypt Makefile) Message-ID: <20030810011011.N83831@blues.jpj.net> In-Reply-To: <20030810032945.GA8393@rot13.obsecurity.org> References: <200308100049.h7A0nKU1069195@repoman.freebsd.org> <20030810032945.GA8393@rot13.obsecurity.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Kris Kennaway wrote: > This port was scheduled for deletion on May 6, and you were informed > by private email. In spite of this fact and the presence of a PR that > contained the fix, you chose to neglect this port for another 3 months > until the time came for it to be removed, and I stepped in and > committed the fix myself. > > I'd like to hear your justification of why you think this is an > appropriate standard of maintainership and why you think you should be > allowed to continue to "maintain" ports in this way. The situation is very similar with the qt145 port. I'd like to see you tend to your own responsibilities rather than what appears to be a campaign against me. -- Trevor Johnson
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030810011011.N83831>