Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2008 15:05:29 -0500 From: "Brian A. Seklecki" <bseklecki@collaborativefusion.com> To: Dag-Erling =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgrav?= <des@des.no> Cc: FreeBSD virtualization mailing list <freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org>, alexus <alexus@gmail.com>, freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@leidinger.net>, "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net>, freebsd-jail@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HEADS UP: r185435 multi-IPv4/v6/no-IP jails in HEAD Message-ID: <1228507529.2805.539.camel@soundwave.ws.pitbpa0.priv.collaborativefusion.com> In-Reply-To: <86skp2l804.fsf@ds4.des.no> References: <20081201085229.D80401@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> <20081201122937.81475f0zhfsjya4o@webmail.leidinger.net> <6ae50c2d0812021800x791d2cfeh45d590de120f76df@mail.gmail.com> <1228483574.2805.499.camel@soundwave.ws.pitbpa0.priv.collaborativefusion.com> <86skp2l804.fsf@ds4.des.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--=-DzfM9tDmMSlP+FSmvwy3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 2008-12-05 at 20:47 +0100, Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav wrote: > The question is, does it change existing behavior, or just add new > functionality? The syntax semantics should be backward compatible, so likely the latter. --=20 Brian A. Seklecki <bseklecki@collaborativefusion.com> Collaborative Fusion, Inc. --=-DzfM9tDmMSlP+FSmvwy3 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAkk5iYkACgkQCne6BNDQ+R8pNgCbBUN98uDRdIGwRyp0AROXaLX5 d+kAn3khdiy56r3w9bvyvnE8qWmMDXcz =oj/T -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-DzfM9tDmMSlP+FSmvwy3--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1228507529.2805.539.camel>