Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 11:48:46 +0200 From: Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@FreeBSD.org> To: Ade Lovett <ade@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Jeremy Lea <reg@FreeBSD.org>, freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: A mozilla lite port. Message-ID: <3C6A367E.121B3571@FreeBSD.org> References: <B88F3443.5F17%ade@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Ade Lovett wrote: > > On 02/12/02 16:27, "Jeremy Lea" <reg@freebsd.org> wrote: > > [massive snippage] > > > > What do people think? > > I like it. I've also been toying with the idea of a little knob (or a > simple slave port) on the mozilla port to automatically bring in > mozilla-headers and mozilla-embedded and install them. Sort of the opposite > of what you're talking about (call it mozilla-full). Things like > gnome-fifth-toe might be a little bit less of a headache, when you've > already gone through one compilation of mozilla (to get mozilla-embedded for > nautilus to get GNOME), only to be immediately faced with another > compilation (mozilla being the first item in gnome-fifth-toe). You don't really need this, because mozilla, mozilla-embedded and mozilla-headers share *the same* WRKSRC, so that whatever your installation order is the mozilla being built only once. This was one of the primary design goals of the mozilla-embedded/mozilla-headers. > Perhaps we could combine this, and also bring in the IPv6 patch (so we can > pitch mozilla+ipv6) we can clean it up for good. No problems here, provided that the resulting patchset is throughly tested both on -stable and -current before it is committed. -Maxim To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-gnome" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3C6A367E.121B3571>