Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2002 20:48:25 -0800 From: bmah@acm.org (Bruce A. Mah) To: John Hay <jhay@icomtek.csir.co.za> Cc: murray@FreeBSD.ORG (Murray Stokely), qa@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: RELENG_4_5 Branch : January 21 ? Message-ID: <200201190448.g0J4mQ560188@bmah.dyndns.org> In-Reply-To: <200201190424.g0J4O3M97256@zibbi.icomtek.csir.co.za> References: <200201190424.g0J4O3M97256@zibbi.icomtek.csir.co.za>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
If memory serves me right, John Hay wrote: > Why not do it in the RELENG_4 tree? Maybe start with it even before RC1 (in > the future). There is nothing that says the documentation shipped with the > RCs shouldn't already claim 4.5 or is there? I think you will get more eyes > on it in the RELENG_4 branch. I try to make the release documentation track newvers.sh...otherwise it's kind of confusing to have multiple release note documents that say "4.5-RELEASE". It's actually quite trivial to bump the version number (it's controlled by SGML entities, which are all defined in one file). Like I pointed out in other email, problems in the release notes are likely due to *other* "misteaks". Bruce. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-qa" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200201190448.g0J4mQ560188>