Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 20 Mar 2009 08:57:08 -0700
From:      Sam Leffler <sam@freebsd.org>
To:        Vasil Dimov <vd@freebsd.org>, src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, svn-src-head@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r189828 - in head: include sys/sys
Message-ID:  <49C3BCD4.4030605@freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <20090320153405.GA62675@zim.MIT.EDU>
References:  <200903142010.n2EKAESF006945@svn.freebsd.org> <20090320140015.GA17645@hub.freebsd.org> <20090320153405.GA62675@zim.MIT.EDU>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
David Schultz wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 20, 2009, Vasil Dimov wrote:
>   
>> On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 08:10:14PM +0000, David Schultz wrote:
>>     
>>> Author: das
>>> Date: Sat Mar 14 20:10:14 2009
>>> New Revision: 189828
>>> URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/189828
>>>
>>> Log:
>>>   Fix the visibility of several prototypes. Also move pthread_kill() and
>>>   pthread_sigmask() to signal.h. In principle, this shouldn't break anything,
>>>       
>> [...]
>>
>> But it did break, see http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=132828
>>
>> I think one's namespace shouldn't be polluted with the prototype of
>> pthread_kill() if he has not included pthread.h.
>>     
>
> The pthreads API has always defined pthread_kill() to be in
> signal.h, not pthread.h. This is what is done in glibc and
> elsewhere.
>
> GNU Pth has some bogus and extremely unportable hacks to ``trick''
> system headers into not declaring symbols:
>
>   /*
>    * Prevent system includes from implicitly including
>    * possibly existing vendor Pthread headers
>    */
>   #define PTHREAD
>   #define PTHREAD_H
>   #define _PTHREAD_T
>   #define _PTHREAD_H
>   #define _PTHREAD_H_
>   #define PTHREAD_INCLUDED
>   #define _PTHREAD_INCLUDED
>   #define SYS_PTHREAD_H
>   #define _SYS_PTHREAD_H
>   #define _SYS_PTHREAD_H_
>   #define SYS_PTHREAD_INCLUDED
>   #define _SYS_PTHREAD_INCLUDED
>   #define BITS_PTHREADTYPES_H
>   #define _BITS_PTHREADTYPES_H
>   #define _BITS_PTHREADTYPES_H_
>   #define _BITS_SIGTHREAD_H
>
> The one that works for glibc is _BITS_SIGTHREAD_H. I'd rather not
> be complicit in these shenanigans, but if we can't easily fix the
> problem in Pth, I suppose we can teach signal.h about one of these
> bogus macros. What do you think?
>
>   

Dumb question, why do we need devel/pth?  Isn't the native pthread 
support sufficient?

    Sam




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?49C3BCD4.4030605>