Date: Sun, 25 Oct 2020 07:51:12 -0400 From: Robert Huff <roberthuff@rcn.com> To: Ralf Mardorf <ralf-mardorf@riseup.net> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: What is the "better / best " method to multi-boot different OSes natively WITHOUT VirtualBox(es) ? Message-ID: <24469.26288.47199.882303@jerusalem.litteratus.org> In-Reply-To: <20201025065025.6a13dc89@archlinux> References: <CALMiprbGBaSJQUAA=1HDZAjvsVNK7dqB_5mBb5DKzV16F3hxHg@mail.gmail.com> <20201024111010.5c867e8540a369b826d26703@sohara.org> <20201025065025.6a13dc89@archlinux>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Ralf Mardorf <ralf-mardorf@riseup.net> writes: Steve O'Hara-Smith wrote: > >bot swap drive bay > > A hot swap drive bay inherits the risk of a damage by static > electricity when changing drives. 1) A quality product should minimize that risk. 2) I have been using an external hot swap drive as backup for over a decade. _Never_ had problems I could reasonably attribute to static discharge. Respectfully, Robert Huff -- Hello ... my name is Coronavirus. You are not wearing a mask? Prepare to die!
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?24469.26288.47199.882303>