Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2006 04:37:21 +1100 From: Peter Jeremy <peterjeremy@optushome.com.au> To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: rar-3.51,1 Message-ID: <20060328173720.GE961@turion.vk2pj.dyndns.org> In-Reply-To: <975053160603271230v2797a618ha425cbb6e939a5d2@mail.gmail.com> References: <975053160603271131x7412218eqf492eb592d43368c@mail.gmail.com> <20060327194350.GA60088@nagual.pp.ru> <20060327195227.GA71544@xor.obsecurity.org> <975053160603271205w42718e6bydc812320807e2272@mail.gmail.com> <20060327200922.GA71991@xor.obsecurity.org> <975053160603271230v2797a618ha425cbb6e939a5d2@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 2006-Mar-27 15:30:49 -0500, Michael Knoll wrote: >Upon reinstalling compat5x I noticed the message about the startup >script it installed in /usr/local/etc/rc.d/. This message flew up the >screen when I installed rar, since it installed compat5x as a >dependancy then automatically moved on to rar. Checking this script I >noticed I needed to add > >compat5x_enable="YES" I got bitten by the same problem yesterday. Is here a reason why the the compat_Xx packages don't default to being enabled? This is very easy to miss since they're usually installed as a requirement for some other port and used to automatically enable. -- Peter Jeremy
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060328173720.GE961>