Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2003 16:58:41 -0800 (PST) From: Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com> To: Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HEADS-UP new statfs structure condidered harmful Message-ID: <200311160058.hAG0wf0U075135@apollo.backplane.com> References: <200311121855.hACItAaG006605@beastie.mckusick.com> <200311152159.hAFLx2mQ074474@apollo.backplane.com> <3FB6BA40.6B7B2FD8@mindspring.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
:> sense to do it.
:
:How do you propose to achieve POSIX compliance? At the library
:level? Or "not at all"?
:
:-- Terry
I don't understand the question. All that happens is that functions like
fstat() and statfs() become libc functions rather then direct syscalls.
The userland program doesn't know the difference, it uses fstat() and
statfs() just like it always has.
-Matt
Matthew Dillon
<dillon@backplane.com>
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200311160058.hAG0wf0U075135>