Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2004 09:14:08 +0100 From: Anthony Ginepro <anthony.ginepro@laposte.net> To: Adam Weinberger <adamw@FreeBSD.org>, freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org, Parv <parv@pair.com> Subject: Re: ports/62486: [NEW PORT] x11-wm/ion-2: Ion is a tiling tabbed window manager designed with keyboard users in mind. Message-ID: <20040322081408.GA2172@renaissance.homeip.net> In-Reply-To: <20040322001832.GA28099@moo.holy.cow> References: <200403211030.i2LAUM3G077796@freefall.freebsd.org> <20040321153155.GX39341@toxic.magnesium.net> <20040322001832.GA28099@moo.holy.cow>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> in message <20040321153155.GX39341@toxic.magnesium.net>, > wrote Adam Weinberger thusly... > > > > If ion3 is available, should an ion2 port still be added? > > Soon we will have a situation that if ion4 is available, why ion3 > should be added. And so on, w/o having any updated version of ion. > > I admit that is/was rather harsh, but i do feel better. It has taken 2 years until ion2 became stable. Hence I don't think ion4 will appear soon. My wish would be to have ion-2-20040207.tar.gz as x11-wm/ion, and ion-3ds-20040316-1.tar.gz, ion-3ds-200ymmdd.tar.gz as x11-wm/ion-devel. When ion-3 become stable, it will be x11-wm/ion, ion-4 as ion-devel and so on. Anthony.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040322081408.GA2172>