Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 13 Oct 2008 23:08:38 +0200
From:      Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz>
To:        Matt Simerson <matt@corp.spry.com>
Cc:        freebsd-fs@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: ZFS on backup fileserver - RAM usage
Message-ID:  <48F3B8D6.6060309@quip.cz>
In-Reply-To: <9AAEBB23-75E8-49B2-BA2F-0AF98F79280F@corp.spry.com>
References:  <48F334A0.3080005@quip.cz> <9AAEBB23-75E8-49B2-BA2F-0AF98F79280F@corp.spry.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Matt Simerson wrote:
> 
> It all depends on your workload. If you work your backup serves hard  
> (as I do, backing up thousands of OS instances), you'll have  
> significant reliability problems using FreeBSD 7.1 and ZFS. After a  
> crash that corrupted my file systems, I have moved to 8-head with  
> Pawel's latest patch.
> 
> My backup servers have between 16 and 24 disks each. The ones with  16GB 
> of RAM crash far less frequently than my server that has only  2GB. That 
> one is getting upgraded soon.
> 
> Matt

I am planning to backup about 10-15 servers (mainly webservers and few 
mailservers) and not expecting high load.
Did 8-current with the latest ZFS patch fixed all stability problems?

Thanks for suggestions to both of you.

Miroslav Lachman



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?48F3B8D6.6060309>