Date: Tue, 8 Jul 1997 10:39:49 -0500 (EST) From: John Fieber <jfieber@indiana.edu> To: Joerg Wunsch <joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de> Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: no SYSVSHM in GENERIC now.. Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.96.970708103717.308U-100000@fallout.campusview.indiana.edu> In-Reply-To: <19970708091450.QL25215@uriah.heep.sax.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 8 Jul 1997, J Wunsch wrote: > Even SYSVSEM is arguable, i think the only `canned' application that > uses them is PEX. (Who uses PEX, anyway? :) Wine seems to use them, and I think postgresql must because wine allocates bunches of semaphores but doesn't release them, and postgresql fails if wine has been run until you manually ipcrm the semaphors that wine left hanging around.... Postgresql definately uses SYSVSHM. -john
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.96.970708103717.308U-100000>