Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 27 Apr 2010 18:54:31 +0200
From:      Jeremie Le Hen <jeremie@le-hen.org>
To:        Alexander Churanov <alexanderchuranov@gmail.com>
Cc:        freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: New "scallhook" feature. Is is OK to create a proposal?
Message-ID:  <20100427165431.GQ34466@felucia.tataz.chchile.org>
In-Reply-To: <s2u3cb459ed1004060627i98f7527at8275d9271bebb1e3@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <s2u3cb459ed1004060627i98f7527at8275d9271bebb1e3@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi Alexander,

On Tue, Apr 06, 2010 at 05:27:29PM +0400, Alexander Churanov wrote:
> About me:
> 
> I am software engineer, currently working in Cisco Systems, specializing in
> C/C++/UNIX. My additional interests are software quality and security. I am
> a port maintainer for devel/boost-* and was participating in extending
> syscons driver, until the project was superseded by syscons rewrite by Ed
> Schouten.
> 
> About Vladislav:
> Vladislav is a PhD of computer science, has experience with developing in C
> and C++ for FreeBSD.
> 
> Before writing the full proposal on the wiki, I'd like to receive the first
> approval.

I don't know what you intend to do after Robert's reply but if you are
seeking a kernel-level security improvement to work on, I suggest to
look at porting PaX into FreeBSD.

Regards,
-- 
Jeremie Le Hen

Humans are born free and equal.  But some are more equal than others.
					    Coluche



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20100427165431.GQ34466>