Date: Tue, 7 Oct 1997 18:25:05 +0200 (MEST) From: Søren Schmidt <sos@sos.freebsd.dk> To: jkh@FreeBSD.ORG (Jordan K. Hubbard) Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Status of perl and tcl in vi? Message-ID: <199710071625.SAA03958@sos.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: <199710071253.FAA06161@freefall.freebsd.org> from "Jordan K. Hubbard" at "Oct 7, 97 05:53:35 am"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In reply to Jordan K. Hubbard who wrote:
> I guess in all the fracas over Tcl, we lost vi's tcl and perl
> interpreters by default? I'm just now noticing that I can't do :tcl <blah>
> anymore where it used to work, and given that I don't use this feature
> very often I can also imagine that it might have left us some time ago
> without my noticing. Weren't we going to allow vi to link with TCL
> in -current unless NOTCL was set?
>
> If we could get perl upgraded to perl5 in the tree, we could include
> it too, heck. Bloat that vi binary! ;-)
AAAARRRGGGGHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Søren Schmidt (sos@FreeBSD.org) FreeBSD Core Team
Even more code to hack -- will it ever end
..
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199710071625.SAA03958>