Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 10 Jan 2013 17:48:45 -0800
From:      JINMEI Tatuya / =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCP0BMQEMjOkgbKEI=?= <jinmei@isc.org>
To:        prabhakar lakhera <prabhakar.lakhera@gmail.com>
Cc:        freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Why did KAME need ND6_LLINFO_WAITDELETE?
Message-ID:  <m2y5g07ama.wl%jinmei@isc.org>
In-Reply-To: <CALg%2BrhV9uSrdjq5KhDF=mA-5cpY8VSEmVc_9AeEzh0dGsTAbZQ@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <CALg%2BrhV9uSrdjq5KhDF=mA-5cpY8VSEmVc_9AeEzh0dGsTAbZQ@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At Thu, 10 Jan 2013 15:50:30 -0800,
prabhakar lakhera <prabhakar.lakhera@gmail.com> wrote:

> I see that* ND6_LLINFO_WAITDELETE *was done away with long time back.
> I was looking for any historical reasons for why it was needed and what
> triggered its removal.

I'd normally change history in the original KAME repository:

http://www.kame.net/dev/cvsweb2.cgi/kame/kame/sys/netinet6/nd6.h
http://www.kame.net/dev/cvsweb2.cgi/kame/kame/sys/netinet6/nd6.c
(search for "ND6_LLINFO_WAITDELETE")

It looks like it was me who made this change but I don't remember
details:-) and I don't have time to look into it closer right now.
If the rationale is still not clear from the logs and specific code
diffs please ask again.

---
JINMEI, Tatuya
Internet Systems Consortium, Inc.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?m2y5g07ama.wl%jinmei>