Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2003 23:13:19 +0100 (CET) From: Marco Beishuizen <marco@beishuizen.info> To: Jan Lentfer <Jan.Lentfer@web.de> Cc: FreeBSD alpha mailing list <alpha@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: Why is XFree86 on FreeBSD/Alpha much slower? Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.53.0302132303200.17772@tsunami.bsd> In-Reply-To: <1045138456.618.5.camel@neslonek> References: <Pine.BSF.4.53.0302112042190.294@tsunami.bsd> <15945.23721.759825.313603@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> <Pine.BSF.4.53.0302112129370.294@tsunami.bsd> <15945.24538.794799.926276@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> <Pine.BSF.4.53.0302112147000.294@tsunami.bsd> <15945.25465.768071.583030@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> <Pine.BSF.4.53.0302112200580.294@tsunami.bsd> <15945.26349.357142.151047@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> <Pine.BSF.4.53.0302112216160.294@tsunami.bsd> <15945.27540.655333.324376@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> <Pine.BSF.4.53.0302112332001.420@tsunami.bsd> <1045138456.618.5.camel@neslonek>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 13 Feb 2003, the wise Jan Lentfer spoke, and said: > Hi all, > > I tried to gather some numbers so one can compare the graphic > performance of 32bit vs. 64bit slot. > I did "x11perf -all" on a PWS 500a, Debian Linux 2.4.20, Xfree 4.2.1, > ATI Radeon with DRI. > > Here are the results from x11perfcomp: > > lentferj@neslonek:~$ x11perfcomp -r ati32bit ati64bit > 1: ati32bit > 2: ati64bit > > 1 2 Operation > -------- ----------------- ----------------- > 2140000.0 4880000.0 ( 2.28) Dot > 1170000.0 1190000.0 ( 1.02) 1x1 rectangle > 1170000.0 1180000.0 ( 1.01) 10x10 rectangle > 32700.0 32700.0 ( 1.00) 100x100 rectangle > 1520.0 1530.0 ( 1.01) 500x500 rectangle > 691000.0 715000.0 ( 1.03) 1x1 stippled rectangle (8x8 stipple) > 633000.0 632000.0 ( 1.00) 10x10 stippled rectangle (8x8 stipple) > 10500.0 10900.0 ( 1.04) 100x100 stippled rectangle (8x8 stipple) > 350.0 352.0 ( 1.01) 500x500 stippled rectangle (8x8 stipple) > 683000.0 714000.0 ( 1.05) 1x1 opaque stippled rectangle (8x8 > stipple) > 673000.0 690000.0 ( 1.03) 10x10 opaque stippled rectangle (8x8 > stipple) > 18400.0 18000.0 ( 0.98) 100x100 opaque stippled rectangle (8x8 > stipple) > 839.0 749.0 ( 0.89) 500x500 opaque stippled rectangle (8x8 > stipple) > 678000.0 696000.0 ( 1.03) 1x1 tiled rectangle (4x4 tile) > 667000.0 685000.0 ( 1.03) 10x10 tiled rectangle (4x4 tile) > 18400.0 18100.0 ( 0.98) 100x100 tiled rectangle (4x4 tile) > 748.0 749.0 ( 1.00) 500x500 tiled rectangle (4x4 tile) > 709000.0 720000.0 ( 1.02) 1x1 stippled rectangle (17x15 stipple) > 664000.0 674000.0 ( 1.02) 10x10 stippled rectangle (17x15 stipple) > 11000.0 11000.0 ( 1.00) 100x100 stippled rectangle (17x15 > stipple) > 363.0 363.0 ( 1.00) 500x500 stippled rectangle (17x15 > stipple) > 709000.0 713000.0 ( 1.01) 1x1 opaque stippled rectangle (17x15 > stipple) > 679000.0 700000.0 ( 1.03) 10x10 opaque stippled rectangle (17x15 > stipple) > 18400.0 18500.0 ( 1.01) 100x100 opaque stippled rectangle (17x15 > stipple) > 746.0 785.0 ( 1.05) 500x500 opaque stippled rectangle (17x15 > stipple) > 708000.0 724000.0 ( 1.02) 1x1 tiled rectangle (17x15 tile) > 679000.0 698000.0 ( 1.03) 10x10 tiled rectangle (17x15 tile) > 18300.0 18500.0 ( 1.01) 100x100 tiled rectangle (17x15 tile) > 731.0 785.0 ( 1.07) 500x500 tiled rectangle (17x15 tile) > 737000.0 752000.0 ( 1.02) 1x1 stippled rectangle (161x145 stipple) > 692000.0 692000.0 ( 1.00) 10x10 stippled rectangle (161x145 > stipple) > 12800.0 12500.0 ( 0.98) 100x100 stippled rectangle (161x145 > stipple) > 400.0 407.0 ( 1.02) 500x500 stippled rectangle (161x145 > stipple) > 740000.0 755000.0 ( 1.02) 1x1 opaque stippled rectangle (161x145 > stipple) > 721000.0 731000.0 ( 1.01) 10x10 opaque stippled rectangle (161x145 > stipple) > 18900.0 19300.0 ( 1.02) 100x100 opaque stippled rectangle > (161x145 stipple) > 805.0 847.0 ( 1.05) 500x500 opaque stippled rectangle > (161x145 stipple) > 740000.0 754000.0 ( 1.02) 1x1 tiled rectangle (161x145 tile) > 720000.0 737000.0 ( 1.02) 10x10 tiled rectangle (161x145 tile) > 18900.0 18300.0 ( 0.97) 100x100 tiled rectangle (161x145 tile) > 805.0 788.0 ( 0.98) 500x500 tiled rectangle (161x145 tile) > 739000.0 755000.0 ( 1.02) 1x1 tiled rectangle (216x208 tile) > 725000.0 742000.0 ( 1.02) 10x10 tiled rectangle (216x208 tile) > 18300.0 17600.0 ( 0.96) 100x100 tiled rectangle (216x208 tile) > 808.0 782.0 ( 0.97) 500x500 tiled rectangle (216x208 tile) > 1080000.0 1160000.0 ( 1.07) 1-pixel line segment > 1240000.0 1280000.0 ( 1.03) 10-pixel line segment > 427000.0 428000.0 ( 1.00) 100-pixel line segment > 86300.0 86500.0 ( 1.00) 500-pixel line segment > 424000.0 439000.0 ( 1.04) 100-pixel line segment (1 kid) > 328000.0 352000.0 ( 1.07) 100-pixel line segment (2 kids) > > > I put the graphic card in the lower one of the two 64bit slot. Would it > make any difference it I put in the upper of the two? Hi, This doesn't look like a big performance improvement. My experience changing to the 64-bit slot is that graphics is a lot faster now (certainly more than a few procent). Especially working with PDF's and in Gimp. Even browsing the web has improved. Perhaps it makes a difference which graphic card is being used. Marco P.S. My graphic card is put in the upper slot :-) -- Overdrawn? But I still have checks left! To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-alpha" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.53.0302132303200.17772>