Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 20:31:37 -0400 From: Steve Bertrand <steve@ibctech.ca> To: "George V. Neville-Neil" <gnn@neville-neil.com> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, security <security@jim-liesl.org> Subject: Re: Throughput rate testing configurations Message-ID: <4851BFE9.5070905@ibctech.ca> In-Reply-To: <m2prqmitkp.wl%gnn@neville-neil.com> References: <484F3E1B.9050104@ibctech.ca> <4850028F.6090103@jim-liesl.org> <m2prqmitkp.wl%gnn@neville-neil.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
George V. Neville-Neil wrote: > At Wed, 11 Jun 2008 09:51:27 -0700, > security wrote: >> Iperf or netperf are probably what you're looking for. > I personally prefer netpipe because it tries odd sized (non power of > 2) messages and tends to help edge cases come to light. > > /usr/ports/benchmarks/netpipe Thank you for the recommendations. I will try out all three of them. I'm certain I'll get the results I am after. Cheers, Steve
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4851BFE9.5070905>